@DB Feature: Address computation Tests for filling of place_addressline # github #121 Scenario: Roads crossing boundaries should contain both states Given the grid | 1 | | | 2 | | 3 | | | 7 | | | 8 | | | 4 | | | 5 | | 6 | And the named places | osm | class | type | geometry | | W1 | highway | road | 7, 8 | And the named places | osm | class | type | admin | geometry | | W10 | boundary | administrative | 5 | (1, 2, 5, 4, 1) | | W11 | boundary | administrative | 5 | (2, 3, 6, 5, 2) | When importing Then place_addressline contains | object | address | cached_rank_address | | W1 | W10 | 10 | | W1 | W11 | 10 | Scenario: buildings with only addr:postcodes do not appear in the address of a way Given the scene admin-areas And the named places | osm | class | type | admin | addr+postcode | geometry | | R1 | boundary | administrative | 6 | 112 | :b0 | | R34 | boundary | administrative | 8 | 112 DE | :b1:E | | R4 | boundary | administrative | 10 | 112 DE 34 | :b2:N | And the named places | osm | class | type | geometry | | W93 | highway | residential | :w2N | And the places | osm | class | type | addr+postcode | geometry | | W22 | place | postcode | 445023 | :building:w2N | When importing Then place_addressline doesn't contain | object | address | | W93 | W22 | Scenario: postcode boundaries do appear in the address of a way Given the scene admin-areas And the named places | osm | class | type | admin | addr+postcode | geometry | | R1 | boundary | administrative | 6 | 112 | :b0 | | R34 | boundary | administrative | 8 | 112 DE | :b1:E | And the places | osm | class | type | addr+postcode | geometry | | R4 | place | postcode | 112 DE 34 | :b2:N | And the named places | osm | class | type | geometry | | W93 | highway | residential | :w2N | And the places | osm | class | type | addr+postcode | geometry | | W22 | place | postcode | 445023 | :building:w2N | When importing Then place_addressline contains | object | address | | W93 | R4 |