```
{
- "place_id": "100149",
+ "place_id": 100149,
"licence": "Data © OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL 1.0. https://osm.org/copyright",
"osm_type": "node",
"osm_id": "107775",
* `ref` - content of `ref` tag if it exists
* `lat`, `lon` - latitude and longitude of the centroid of the object
* `boundingbox` - comma-separated list of corner coordinates ([see notes](#boundingbox))
- * `place_rank` - class [search rank](../develop/Ranking#search-rank)
- * `address_rank` - place [address rank](../develop/Ranking#address-rank)
+ * `place_rank` - class [search rank](../customize/Ranking.md#search-rank)
+ * `address_rank` - place [address rank](../customize/Ranking.md#address-rank)
* `display_name` - full comma-separated address
* `class`, `type` - key and value of the main OSM tag
* `importance` - computed importance rank
removed and reimported while updating the database with fresh OSM data.
It is thus not useful to treat it as permanent for later use.
-The combination `osm_type`+`osm_id` is slighly better but remember in
+The combination `osm_type`+`osm_id` is slightly better but remember in
OpenStreetMap mappers can delete, split, recreate places (and those
get a new `osm_id`), there is no link between those old and new ids.
Places can also change their meaning without changing their `osm_id`,
* city_district, district, borough, suburb, subdivision
* hamlet, croft, isolated_dwelling
* neighbourhood, allotments, quarter
- * city_block, residental, farm, farmyard, industrial, commercial, retail
+ * city_block, residential, farm, farmyard, industrial, commercial, retail
* road
* house_number, house_name
* emergency, historic, military, natural, landuse, place, railway,