+ -- Postcodes are just here to compute the centroids. They are not searchable
+ -- unless they are a boundary=postal_code.
+ -- There was an error in the style so that boundary=postal_code used to be
+ -- imported as place=postcode. That's why relations are allowed to pass here.
+ -- This can go away in a couple of versions.
+ IF NEW.class = 'place' and NEW.type = 'postcode' and NEW.osm_type != 'R' THEN
+ RETURN NEW;
+ END IF;
+
+ -- Speed up searches - just use the centroid of the feature
+ -- cheaper but less acurate
+ NEW.centroid := ST_PointOnSurface(NEW.geometry);
+ --DEBUG: RAISE WARNING 'Computing preliminary centroid at %',ST_AsText(NEW.centroid);
+
+ -- recompute the ranks, they might change when linking changes
+ SELECT * INTO NEW.rank_search, NEW.rank_address
+ FROM compute_place_rank(NEW.country_code,
+ CASE WHEN ST_GeometryType(NEW.geometry)
+ IN ('ST_Polygon','ST_MultiPolygon')
+ THEN 'A' ELSE NEW.osm_type END,
+ NEW.class, NEW.type, NEW.admin_level,
+ (NEW.extratags->'capital') = 'yes',
+ NEW.address->'postcode');
+ -- We must always increase the address level relative to the admin boundary.
+ IF NEW.class = 'boundary' and NEW.type = 'administrative'
+ and NEW.osm_type = 'R' and NEW.rank_address > 0
+ THEN
+ -- First, check that admin boundaries do not overtake each other rank-wise.
+ parent_address_level := 3;
+ FOR location IN
+ SELECT rank_address,
+ (CASE WHEN extratags ? 'wikidata' and NEW.extratags ? 'wikidata'
+ and extratags->'wikidata' = NEW.extratags->'wikidata'
+ THEN ST_Equals(geometry, NEW.geometry)
+ ELSE false END) as is_same
+ FROM placex
+ WHERE osm_type = 'R' and class = 'boundary' and type = 'administrative'
+ and admin_level < NEW.admin_level and admin_level > 3
+ and rank_address > 0
+ and geometry && NEW.centroid and _ST_Covers(geometry, NEW.centroid)
+ ORDER BY admin_level desc LIMIT 1
+ LOOP
+ IF location.is_same THEN
+ -- Looks like the same boundary is replicated on multiple admin_levels.
+ -- Usual tagging in Poland. Remove our boundary from addresses.
+ NEW.rank_address := 0;
+ ELSE
+ parent_address_level := location.rank_address;
+ IF location.rank_address >= NEW.rank_address THEN
+ IF location.rank_address >= 24 THEN
+ NEW.rank_address := 25;
+ ELSE
+ NEW.rank_address := location.rank_address + 2;
+ END IF;
+ END IF;
+ END IF;
+ END LOOP;
+
+ IF NEW.rank_address > 9 THEN
+ -- Second check that the boundary is not completely contained in a
+ -- place area with a higher address rank
+ FOR location IN
+ SELECT rank_address FROM placex
+ WHERE class = 'place' and rank_address < 24
+ and rank_address > NEW.rank_address
+ and geometry && NEW.geometry
+ and geometry ~ NEW.geometry -- needed because ST_Relate does not do bbox cover test
+ and ST_Relate(geometry, NEW.geometry, 'T*T***FF*') -- contains but not equal
+ ORDER BY rank_address desc LIMIT 1
+ LOOP
+ NEW.rank_address := location.rank_address + 2;
+ END LOOP;
+ END IF;
+ ELSEIF NEW.class = 'place' and NEW.osm_type = 'N'
+ and NEW.rank_address between 16 and 23
+ THEN
+ -- If a place node is contained in a admin boundary with the same address level
+ -- and has not been linked, then make the node a subpart by increasing the
+ -- address rank (city level and above).
+ FOR location IN
+ SELECT rank_address FROM placex
+ WHERE osm_type = 'R' and class = 'boundary' and type = 'administrative'
+ and rank_address = NEW.rank_address
+ and geometry && NEW.centroid and _ST_Covers(geometry, NEW.centroid)
+ LIMIT 1
+ LOOP
+ NEW.rank_address = NEW.rank_address + 2;
+ END LOOP;
+ ELSE
+ parent_address_level := 3;
+ END IF;
+