assert_equal way[0], -4
assert_equal way[1], "way"
assert_equal way[2], id
- assert way[3].empty? and way[4].empty?
+ assert way[3].nil? and way[4].nil?
end
def test_getway_nonexistent
assert_equal way[0], -4
assert_equal way[1], "way"
assert_equal way[2], 0
- assert way[3].empty? and way[4].empty?
+ assert way[3].nil? and way[4].nil?
end
def test_whichways
assert_equal rel[0], -4
assert_equal rel[1], "relation"
assert_equal rel[2], id
- assert rel[3].empty? and rel[4].empty?
+ assert rel[3].nil? and rel[4].nil?
end
def test_getrelation_nonexistent
assert_equal rel[0], -4
assert_equal rel[1], "relation"
assert_equal rel[2], id
- assert rel[3].empty? and rel[4].empty?
+ assert rel[3].nil? and rel[4].nil?
end
def test_getway_old
amf_parse_response
returned_way = amf_result("/1")
assert_equal -1, returned_way[0]
- assert returned_way[3].empty?
- assert returned_way[4].empty?
+ assert returned_way[3].nil?
+ assert returned_way[4].nil?
assert returned_way[5].nil?
end
end
amf_parse_response
returned_way = amf_result("/1")
assert_equal -1, returned_way[0]
- assert returned_way[3].empty?
- assert returned_way[4].empty?
+ assert returned_way[3].nil?
+ assert returned_way[4].nil?
assert returned_way[5].nil?
end
end
# ['way',wayid,history]
assert_equal 'way', history[0]
assert_equal latest.id, history[1]
- # for some reason undocumented, the potlatch API now prefers dates
- # over version numbers. presumably no-one edits concurrently any more?
- assert_equal latest.timestamp.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"), history[2].first[0]
- assert_equal oldest.timestamp.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"), history[2].last[0]
+ # We use dates rather than version numbers here, because you might
+ # have moved a node within a way (i.e. way version not incremented).
+ # The timestamp is +1 (timestamp.succ) because we say "give me the
+ # revision of 15:33:02", but that might actually include changes at
+ # 15:33:02.457.
+ assert_equal latest.timestamp.succ.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"), history[2].first[0]
+ assert_equal oldest.timestamp.succ.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"), history[2].last[0]
end
def test_getway_history_nonexistent
history = amf_result("/1")
# ['node',nodeid,history]
+ # note that (as per getway_history) we actually round up
+ # to the next second
assert_equal history[0], 'node',
'first element should be "node"'
assert_equal history[1], latest.id,
'second element should be the input node ID'
- # NOTE: changed this test to match what amf_controller actually
- # outputs - which may or may not be what potlatch is expecting.
- # someone who knows potlatch (i.e: richard f) should review this.
- # NOTE2: wow - this is the second time this has changed in the
- # API and the tests are being patched up.
assert_equal history[2].first[0],
- latest.timestamp.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"),
- 'first part of third element should be the latest version'
+ latest.timestamp.succ.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"),
+ 'first element in third element (array) should be the latest version'
assert_equal history[2].last[0],
- nodes(:node_with_versions_v1).timestamp.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"),
- 'second part of third element should be the initial version'
+ nodes(:node_with_versions_v1).timestamp.succ.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"),
+ 'last element in third element (array) should be the initial version'
end
def test_getnode_history_nonexistent
assert_equal result[4], first_historic_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf"
end
+ # try creating a POI with rubbish in the tags
+ def test_putpoi_create_with_control_chars
+ # This node has no tags
+ nd = Node.new
+ # create a node with random lat/lon
+ lat = rand(100)-50 + rand
+ lon = rand(100)-50 + rand
+ # normal user has a changeset open
+ changeset = changesets(:public_user_first_change)
+
+ mostly_invalid = (0..31).to_a.map {|i| i.chr}.join
+ tags = { "something" => "foo#{mostly_invalid}bar" }
+
+ amf_content "putpoi", "/1", ["test@example.com:test", changeset.id, nil, nil, lon, lat, tags, nil]
+ post :amf_write
+ assert_response :success
+ amf_parse_response
+ result = amf_result("/1")
+
+ # check the array returned by the amf
+ assert_equal 5, result.size
+ assert_equal 0, result[0], "Expected to get the status ok in the amf"
+ assert_equal 0, result[2], "The old id should be 0"
+ assert result[3] > 0, "The new id should be greater than 0"
+ assert_equal 1, result[4], "The new version should be 1"
+
+ # Finally check that the node that was saved has saved the data correctly
+ # in both the current and history tables
+ # First check the current table
+ current_node = Node.find(result[3])
+ assert_equal 1, current_node.tags.size, "There seems to be a tag that has been added to the node"
+ assert_equal({ "something" => "foo\t\n\rbar" }, current_node.tags, "tags were not fixed correctly")
+ assert_equal result[4], current_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf"
+ end
+
+ # try creating a POI with rubbish in the tags
+ def test_putpoi_create_with_invalid_utf8
+ # This node has no tags
+ nd = Node.new
+ # create a node with random lat/lon
+ lat = rand(100)-50 + rand
+ lon = rand(100)-50 + rand
+ # normal user has a changeset open
+ changeset = changesets(:public_user_first_change)
+
+ invalid = "\xc0\xc0"
+ tags = { "something" => "foo#{invalid}bar" }
+
+ amf_content "putpoi", "/1", ["test@example.com:test", changeset.id, nil, nil, lon, lat, tags, nil]
+ post :amf_write
+ assert_response :success
+ amf_parse_response
+ result = amf_result("/1")
+
+ assert_equal 2, result.size
+ assert_equal -1, result[0], "Expected to get the status FAIL in the amf"
+ assert_equal "One of the tags is invalid. Linux users may need to upgrade to Flash Player 10.1.", result[1]
+ end
+
def test_putpoi_delete_valid
end
# this should be what AMF controller returns when the bbox of a
# whichways request is invalid or too large.
def assert_boundary_error(map, msg=nil, error_hint=nil)
- expected_map = [-2, "Sorry - I can't get the map for that area.#{msg}", [], [], []]
+ expected_map = [-2, "Sorry - I can't get the map for that area.#{msg}"]
assert_equal expected_map, map, "AMF controller should have returned an error. (#{error_hint})"
end
# this should be what AMF controller returns when the bbox of a
# whichways_deleted request is invalid or too large.
def assert_deleted_boundary_error(map, msg=nil, error_hint=nil)
- expected_map = [-2, "Sorry - I can't get the map for that area.#{msg}", []]
+ expected_map = [-2, "Sorry - I can't get the map for that area.#{msg}"]
assert_equal expected_map, map, "AMF controller should have returned an error. (#{error_hint})"
end
end
projects / rails.git / blobdiff