Changing the note search limit from 9999 to 10000

[rails.git] / test / functional / amf_controller_test.rb

diff --git a/test/functional/amf_controller_test.rb b/test/functional/amf_controller_test.rb
index 2c76dfc9cc29b5058c9a7d5404f886d73f7ebb04..f3a4e7cd1b642ea69da87723ea2010eae669761d 100644 (file)
--- a/test/functional/amf_controller_test.rb
+++ b/test/functional/amf_controller_test.rb
@@ -5,6 +5,19 @@ include Potlatch
 class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
   api_fixtures
 
 class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
   api_fixtures
 

+  ##
+  # test all routes which lead to this controller
+  def test_routes
+    assert_routing(
+      { :path => "/api/0.6/amf/read", :method => :post },
+      { :controller => "amf", :action => "amf_read" }
+    )
+    assert_routing(
+      { :path => "/api/0.6/amf/write", :method => :post },
+      { :controller => "amf", :action => "amf_write" }
+    )
+  end
+

   def test_getway
     # check a visible way
     id = current_ways(:visible_way).id
   def test_getway
     # check a visible way
     id = current_ways(:visible_way).id


@@ -208,16 +221,16 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
     # instead of a version number...
     # try to get version 1
     v1 = ways(:way_with_versions_v1)
     # instead of a version number...
     # try to get version 1
     v1 = ways(:way_with_versions_v1)

-    { latest => '', 
-      v1 => v1.timestamp.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S")
-    }.each do |way, t|
-      amf_content "getway_old", "/1", [way.id, t]
+    { latest.id => '', 
+      v1.way_id => v1.timestamp.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S")
+    }.each do |id, t|
+      amf_content "getway_old", "/1", [id, t]

       post :amf_read      
       assert_response :success
       amf_parse_response
       returned_way = amf_result("/1")
       assert_equal 0, returned_way[0]
       post :amf_read      
       assert_response :success
       amf_parse_response
       returned_way = amf_result("/1")
       assert_equal 0, returned_way[0]

-      assert_equal way.id, returned_way[2]
+      assert_equal id, returned_way[2]

       # API returns the *latest* version, even for old ways...
       assert_equal latest.version, returned_way[5]
     end
       # API returns the *latest* version, even for old ways...
       assert_equal latest.version, returned_way[5]
     end


@@ -251,11 +264,11 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
     v1 = ways(:way_with_versions_v1)
     # try to get last visible version of non-existent way
     # try to get specific version of non-existent way
     v1 = ways(:way_with_versions_v1)
     # try to get last visible version of non-existent way
     # try to get specific version of non-existent way

-    [[nil, ''], 
-     [nil, '1 Jan 1970, 00:00:00'], 
-     [v1, (v1.timestamp - 10).strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S")]
-    ].each do |way, t|
-      amf_content "getway_old", "/1", [way.nil? ? 0 : way.id, t]
+    [[0, ''], 
+     [0, '1 Jan 1970, 00:00:00'], 
+     [v1.way_id, (v1.timestamp - 10).strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S")]
+    ].each do |id, t|
+      amf_content "getway_old", "/1", [id, t]

       post :amf_read
       assert_response :success
       amf_parse_response
       post :amf_read
       assert_response :success
       amf_parse_response


@@ -282,11 +295,10 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
     assert_equal latest.id, history[1] 
     # We use dates rather than version numbers here, because you might
     # have moved a node within a way (i.e. way version not incremented).
     assert_equal latest.id, history[1] 
     # We use dates rather than version numbers here, because you might
     # have moved a node within a way (i.e. way version not incremented).

-    # The timestamp is +1 (timestamp.succ) because we say "give me the
-    # revision of 15:33:02", but that might actually include changes at
-    # 15:33:02.457.
-    assert_equal latest.timestamp.succ.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"), history[2].first[0]
-    assert_equal oldest.timestamp.succ.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"), history[2].last[0]
+    # The timestamp is +1 because we say "give me the revision of 15:33:02",
+    # but that might actually include changes at 15:33:02.457.
+    assert_equal (latest.timestamp + 1).strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"), history[2].first[0]
+    assert_equal (oldest.timestamp + 1).strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"), history[2].last[0]

   end
 
   def test_getway_history_nonexistent
   end
 
   def test_getway_history_nonexistent


@@ -318,10 +330,10 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
     assert_equal history[1], latest.id,
       'second element should be the input node ID'
     assert_equal history[2].first[0], 
     assert_equal history[1], latest.id,
       'second element should be the input node ID'
     assert_equal history[2].first[0], 

-      latest.timestamp.succ.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"),
+      (latest.timestamp + 1).strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"),

       'first element in third element (array) should be the latest version'
     assert_equal history[2].last[0], 
       'first element in third element (array) should be the latest version'
     assert_equal history[2].last[0], 

-      nodes(:node_with_versions_v1).timestamp.succ.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"),
+      (nodes(:node_with_versions_v1).timestamp + 1).strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"),

       'last element in third element (array) should be the initial version'
   end
 
       'last element in third element (array) should be the initial version'
   end
 


@@ -398,13 +410,13 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
     # Finally check that the node that was saved has saved the data correctly 
     # in both the current and history tables
     # First check the current table
     # Finally check that the node that was saved has saved the data correctly 
     # in both the current and history tables
     # First check the current table

-    current_node = Node.find(result[3])
+    current_node = Node.find(result[3].to_i)

     assert_in_delta lat, current_node.lat, 0.00001, "The latitude was not retreieved correctly"
     assert_in_delta lon, current_node.lon, 0.00001, "The longitude was not retreived correctly"
     assert_equal 0, current_node.tags.size, "There seems to be a tag that has been added to the node"
     assert_equal result[4], current_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf"
     # Now check the history table
     assert_in_delta lat, current_node.lat, 0.00001, "The latitude was not retreieved correctly"
     assert_in_delta lon, current_node.lon, 0.00001, "The longitude was not retreived correctly"
     assert_equal 0, current_node.tags.size, "There seems to be a tag that has been added to the node"
     assert_equal result[4], current_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf"
     # Now check the history table

-    historic_nodes = Node.find(:all, :conditions => { :id => result[3] })
+    historic_nodes = Node.where(:id => result[3])

     assert_equal 1, historic_nodes.size, "There should only be one historic node created"
     first_historic_node = historic_nodes.first
     assert_in_delta lat, first_historic_node.lat, 0.00001, "The latitude was not retreived correctly"
     assert_equal 1, historic_nodes.size, "There should only be one historic node created"
     first_historic_node = historic_nodes.first
     assert_in_delta lat, first_historic_node.lat, 0.00001, "The latitude was not retreived correctly"


@@ -437,14 +449,14 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
     # Finally check that the node that was saved has saved the data correctly 
     # in both the current and history tables
     # First check the current table
     # Finally check that the node that was saved has saved the data correctly 
     # in both the current and history tables
     # First check the current table

-    current_node = Node.find(result[3])
+    current_node = Node.find(result[3].to_i)

     assert_in_delta lat, current_node.lat, 0.00001, "The latitude was not retreieved correctly"
     assert_in_delta lon, current_node.lon, 0.00001, "The longitude was not retreived correctly"
     assert_equal 2, current_node.tags.size, "There seems to be a tag that has been added to the node"
     assert_equal({ "key" => "value", "ping" => "pong" }, current_node.tags, "tags are different")
     assert_equal result[4], current_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf"
     # Now check the history table
     assert_in_delta lat, current_node.lat, 0.00001, "The latitude was not retreieved correctly"
     assert_in_delta lon, current_node.lon, 0.00001, "The longitude was not retreived correctly"
     assert_equal 2, current_node.tags.size, "There seems to be a tag that has been added to the node"
     assert_equal({ "key" => "value", "ping" => "pong" }, current_node.tags, "tags are different")
     assert_equal result[4], current_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf"
     # Now check the history table

-    historic_nodes = Node.find(:all, :conditions => { :id => result[3] })
+    historic_nodes = Node.where(:id => result[3])

     assert_equal 1, historic_nodes.size, "There should only be one historic node created"
     first_historic_node = historic_nodes.first
     assert_in_delta lat, first_historic_node.lat, 0.00001, "The latitude was not retreived correctly"
     assert_equal 1, historic_nodes.size, "There should only be one historic node created"
     first_historic_node = historic_nodes.first
     assert_in_delta lat, first_historic_node.lat, 0.00001, "The latitude was not retreived correctly"


@@ -483,7 +495,7 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
     # Finally check that the node that was saved has saved the data correctly 
     # in both the current and history tables
     # First check the current table
     # Finally check that the node that was saved has saved the data correctly 
     # in both the current and history tables
     # First check the current table

-    current_node = Node.find(result[3])
+    current_node = Node.find(result[3].to_i)

     assert_equal 1, current_node.tags.size, "There seems to be a tag that has been added to the node"
     assert_equal({ "something" => "foo\t\n\rbar" }, current_node.tags, "tags were not fixed correctly")
     assert_equal result[4], current_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf"
     assert_equal 1, current_node.tags.size, "There seems to be a tag that has been added to the node"
     assert_equal({ "something" => "foo\t\n\rbar" }, current_node.tags, "tags were not fixed correctly")
     assert_equal result[4], current_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf"


@@ -541,7 +553,7 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
 
     assert_equal 3, result.size, result.inspect
     assert_equal 0, result[0]
 
     assert_equal 3, result.size, result.inspect
     assert_equal 0, result[0]

-    new_cs_id = result[2]
+    new_cs_id = result[2].to_i

 
     cs = Changeset.find(new_cs_id)
     assert_equal "foobar", cs.tags["comment"]
 
     cs = Changeset.find(new_cs_id)
     assert_equal "foobar", cs.tags["comment"]


@@ -577,13 +589,8 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
   # The result is a hash of message_ref => data.
   # The attribute @amf_result is initialised to this hash.
   def amf_parse_response
   # The result is a hash of message_ref => data.
   # The attribute @amf_result is initialised to this hash.
   def amf_parse_response

-    if @response.body.class.to_s == 'Proc'
-      res = StringIO.new()
-      @response.body.call @response, res
-      req = StringIO.new(res.string)
-    else
-      req = StringIO.new(@response.body)
-    end
+    req = StringIO.new(@response.body)
+

     req.read(2)   # version
 
     # parse through any headers
     req.read(2)   # version
 
     # parse through any headers