+ def test_getway_old_nonexistent
+ # try to get the last version+10 (shoudn't exist)
+ v1 = ways(:way_with_versions_v1)
+ # try to get last visible version of non-existent way
+ # try to get specific version of non-existent way
+ [[nil, ''],
+ [nil, '1 Jan 1970, 00:00:00'],
+ [v1, (v1.timestamp - 10).strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S")]
+ ].each do |way, t|
+ amf_content "getway_old", "/1", [way.nil? ? 0 : way.id, t]
+ post :amf_read
+ assert_response :success
+ amf_parse_response
+ returned_way = amf_result("/1")
+ assert_equal -1, returned_way[0]
+ assert returned_way[3].empty?
+ assert returned_way[4].empty?
+ assert returned_way[5].nil?
+ end
+ end
+
+ def test_getway_history
+ latest = current_ways(:way_with_versions)
+ oldest = ways(:way_with_versions_v1)
+
+ amf_content "getway_history", "/1", [latest.id]
+ post :amf_read
+ assert_response :success
+ amf_parse_response
+ history = amf_result("/1")
+
+ # ['way',wayid,history]
+ assert_equal 'way', history[0]
+ assert_equal latest.id, history[1]
+ # for some reason undocumented, the potlatch API now prefers dates
+ # over version numbers. presumably no-one edits concurrently any more?
+ assert_equal latest.timestamp.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"), history[2].first[0]
+ assert_equal oldest.timestamp.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"), history[2].last[0]
+ end
+
+ def test_getway_history_nonexistent
+ amf_content "getway_history", "/1", [0]
+ post :amf_read
+ assert_response :success
+ amf_parse_response
+ history = amf_result("/1")
+
+ # ['way',wayid,history]
+ assert_equal history[0], 'way'
+ assert_equal history[1], 0
+ assert history[2].empty?
+ end
+
+ def test_getnode_history
+ latest = current_nodes(:node_with_versions)
+ amf_content "getnode_history", "/1", [latest.id]
+ post :amf_read
+ assert_response :success
+ amf_parse_response
+ history = amf_result("/1")
+
+ # ['node',nodeid,history]
+ assert_equal history[0], 'node',
+ 'first element should be "node"'
+ assert_equal history[1], latest.id,
+ 'second element should be the input node ID'
+ # NOTE: changed this test to match what amf_controller actually
+ # outputs - which may or may not be what potlatch is expecting.
+ # someone who knows potlatch (i.e: richard f) should review this.
+ # NOTE2: wow - this is the second time this has changed in the
+ # API and the tests are being patched up.
+ assert_equal history[2].first[0],
+ latest.timestamp.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"),
+ 'first part of third element should be the latest version'
+ assert_equal history[2].last[0],
+ nodes(:node_with_versions_v1).timestamp.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"),
+ 'second part of third element should be the initial version'
+ end
+
+ def test_getnode_history_nonexistent
+ amf_content "getnode_history", "/1", [0]
+ post :amf_read
+ assert_response :success
+ amf_parse_response
+ history = amf_result("/1")
+
+ # ['node',nodeid,history]
+ assert_equal history[0], 'node'
+ assert_equal history[1], 0
+ assert history[2].empty?
+ end
+
+ # ************************************************************
+ # AMF Write tests
+ def test_putpoi_update_valid
+ nd = current_nodes(:visible_node)
+ cs_id = changesets(:public_user_first_change).id
+ amf_content "putpoi", "/1", ["test@example.com:test", cs_id, nd.version, nd.id, nd.lon, nd.lat, nd.tags, nd.visible]
+ post :amf_write
+ assert_response :success
+ amf_parse_response
+ result = amf_result("/1")
+
+ assert_equal 0, result[0]
+ assert_equal "", result[1]
+ assert_equal nd.id, result[2]
+ assert_equal nd.id, result[3]
+ assert_equal nd.version+1, result[4]
+
+ # Now try to update again, with a different lat/lon, using the updated version number
+ lat = nd.lat+0.1
+ lon = nd.lon-0.1
+ amf_content "putpoi", "/2", ["test@example.com:test", cs_id, nd.version+1, nd.id, lon, lat, nd.tags, nd.visible]
+ post :amf_write
+ assert_response :success
+ amf_parse_response
+ result = amf_result("/2")
+
+ assert_equal 0, result[0]
+ assert_equal "", result[1]
+ assert_equal nd.id, result[2]
+ assert_equal nd.id, result[3]
+ assert_equal nd.version+2, result[4]
+ end
+
+ # Check that we can create a no valid poi
+ # Using similar method for the node controller test
+ def test_putpoi_create_valid
+ # This node has no tags
+ nd = Node.new
+ # create a node with random lat/lon
+ lat = rand(100)-50 + rand
+ lon = rand(100)-50 + rand
+ # normal user has a changeset open
+ changeset = changesets(:public_user_first_change)
+
+ amf_content "putpoi", "/1", ["test@example.com:test", changeset.id, nil, nil, lon, lat, {}, nil]
+ post :amf_write
+ assert_response :success
+ amf_parse_response
+ result = amf_result("/1")
+
+ # check the array returned by the amf
+ assert_equal 5, result.size
+ assert_equal 0, result[0], "expected to get the status ok from the amf"
+ assert_equal 0, result[2], "The old id should be 0"
+ assert result[3] > 0, "The new id should be greater than 0"
+ assert_equal 1, result[4], "The new version should be 1"
+
+ # Finally check that the node that was saved has saved the data correctly
+ # in both the current and history tables
+ # First check the current table
+ current_node = Node.find(result[3])
+ assert_in_delta lat, current_node.lat, 0.00001, "The latitude was not retreieved correctly"
+ assert_in_delta lon, current_node.lon, 0.00001, "The longitude was not retreived correctly"
+ assert_equal 0, current_node.tags.size, "There seems to be a tag that has been added to the node"
+ assert_equal result[4], current_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf"
+ # Now check the history table
+ historic_nodes = Node.find(:all, :conditions => { :id => result[3] })
+ assert_equal 1, historic_nodes.size, "There should only be one historic node created"
+ first_historic_node = historic_nodes.first
+ assert_in_delta lat, first_historic_node.lat, 0.00001, "The latitude was not retreived correctly"
+ assert_in_delta lon, first_historic_node.lon, 0.00001, "The longitude was not retreuved correctly"
+ assert_equal 0, first_historic_node.tags.size, "There seems to be a tag that have been attached to this node"
+ assert_equal result[4], first_historic_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf"
+
+ ####
+ # This node has some tags
+ tnd = Node.new
+ # create a node with random lat/lon
+ lat = rand(100)-50 + rand
+ lon = rand(100)-50 + rand
+ # normal user has a changeset open
+ changeset = changesets(:public_user_first_change)
+
+ amf_content "putpoi", "/2", ["test@example.com:test", changeset.id, nil, nil, lon, lat, { "key" => "value", "ping" => "pong" }, nil]
+ post :amf_write
+ assert_response :success
+ amf_parse_response
+ result = amf_result("/2")
+
+ # check the array returned by the amf
+ assert_equal 5, result.size
+ assert_equal 0, result[0], "Expected to get the status ok in the amf"
+ assert_equal 0, result[2], "The old id should be 0"
+ assert result[3] > 0, "The new id should be greater than 0"
+ assert_equal 1, result[4], "The new version should be 1"
+
+ # Finally check that the node that was saved has saved the data correctly
+ # in both the current and history tables
+ # First check the current table
+ current_node = Node.find(result[3])
+ assert_in_delta lat, current_node.lat, 0.00001, "The latitude was not retreieved correctly"
+ assert_in_delta lon, current_node.lon, 0.00001, "The longitude was not retreived correctly"
+ assert_equal 2, current_node.tags.size, "There seems to be a tag that has been added to the node"
+ assert_equal({ "key" => "value", "ping" => "pong" }, current_node.tags, "tags are different")
+ assert_equal result[4], current_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf"
+ # Now check the history table
+ historic_nodes = Node.find(:all, :conditions => { :id => result[3] })
+ assert_equal 1, historic_nodes.size, "There should only be one historic node created"
+ first_historic_node = historic_nodes.first
+ assert_in_delta lat, first_historic_node.lat, 0.00001, "The latitude was not retreived correctly"
+ assert_in_delta lon, first_historic_node.lon, 0.00001, "The longitude was not retreuved correctly"
+ assert_equal 2, first_historic_node.tags.size, "There seems to be a tag that have been attached to this node"
+ assert_equal({ "key" => "value", "ping" => "pong" }, first_historic_node.tags, "tags are different")
+ assert_equal result[4], first_historic_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf"
+ end
+
+ def test_putpoi_delete_valid
+
+ end
+
+ def test_putpoi_delete_already_deleted
+
+ end
+
+ def test_putpoi_delete_not_found
+
+ end
+
+ def test_putpoi_invalid_latlon
+
+ end
+
+ # ************************************************************
+ # AMF Helper functions
+
projects / rails.git / blobdiff