X-Git-Url: https://git.openstreetmap.org./rails.git/blobdiff_plain/2aa3daf0e091be9a3257e08f4059b6adfb05fc10..aa4205482a4af317ec26fc686793b57f02a6864a:/test/functional/amf_controller_test.rb?ds=sidebyside diff --git a/test/functional/amf_controller_test.rb b/test/functional/amf_controller_test.rb index 0cf56fca4..46ff71eb7 100644 --- a/test/functional/amf_controller_test.rb +++ b/test/functional/amf_controller_test.rb @@ -5,14 +5,29 @@ include Potlatch class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase api_fixtures + ## + # test all routes which lead to this controller + def test_routes + assert_routing( + { :path => "/api/0.6/amf/read", :method => :post }, + { :controller => "amf", :action => "amf_read" } + ) + assert_routing( + { :path => "/api/0.6/amf/write", :method => :post }, + { :controller => "amf", :action => "amf_write" } + ) + end + def test_getway # check a visible way id = current_ways(:visible_way).id amf_content "getway", "/1", [id] post :amf_read assert_response :success - amf_parse_response - assert_equal amf_result("/1")[0], id + amf_parse_response + way = amf_result("/1") + assert_equal way[0], 0 + assert_equal way[2], id end def test_getway_invisible @@ -23,8 +38,10 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase assert_response :success amf_parse_response way = amf_result("/1") - assert_equal way[0], id - assert way[1].empty? and way[2].empty? + assert_equal way[0], -4 + assert_equal way[1], "way" + assert_equal way[2], id + assert way[3].nil? and way[4].nil? end def test_getway_nonexistent @@ -34,8 +51,10 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase assert_response :success amf_parse_response way = amf_result("/1") - assert_equal way[0], 0 - assert way[1].empty? and way[2].empty? + assert_equal way[0], -4 + assert_equal way[1], "way" + assert_equal way[2], 0 + assert way[3].nil? and way[4].nil? end def test_whichways @@ -51,47 +70,75 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase # check contents of message map = amf_result "/1" - assert map[0].include?(current_ways(:used_way).id) - assert !map[0].include?(current_ways(:invisible_way).id) + assert_equal 0, map[0], 'map error code should be 0' + assert_equal "", map[1], 'map error text should be empty' + + # check the formatting of the message + assert_equal 5, map.length, 'map should have length 5' + assert_equal Array, map[2].class, 'map "ways" element should be an array' + assert_equal Array, map[3].class, 'map "nodes" element should be an array' + assert_equal Array, map[4].class, 'map "relations" element should be an array' + map[2].each do |w| + assert_equal 2, w.length, 'way should be (id, version) pair' + assert w[0] == w[0].floor, 'way ID should be an integer' + assert w[1] == w[1].floor, 'way version should be an integer' + end + + map[3].each do |n| + assert_equal 5, w.length, 'node should be (id, lat, lon, [tags], version) tuple' + assert n[0] == n[0].floor, 'node ID should be an integer' + assert n[1] >= minlat - 0.01, 'node lat should be greater than min' + assert n[1] <= maxlat - 0.01, 'node lat should be less than max' + assert n[2] >= minlon - 0.01, 'node lon should be greater than min' + assert n[2] <= maxlon - 0.01, 'node lon should be less than max' + assert_equal Array, a[3].class, 'node tags should be array' + assert n[4] == n[4].floor, 'node version should be an integer' + end + + map[4].each do |r| + assert_equal 2, r.length, 'relation should be (id, version) pair' + assert r[0] == r[0].floor, 'relation ID should be an integer' + assert r[1] == r[1].floor, 'relation version should be an integer' + end + + # TODO: looks like amf_controller changed since this test was written + # so someone who knows what they're doing should check this! + ways = map[2].collect { |x| x[0] } + assert ways.include?(current_ways(:used_way).id), + "map should include used way" + assert !ways.include?(current_ways(:invisible_way).id), + 'map should not include deleted way' end + ## + # checks that too-large a bounding box will not be served. def test_whichways_toobig bbox = [-0.1,-0.1,1.1,1.1] - amf_content "whichways", "/1", bbox - post :amf_read - assert_response :success - amf_parse_response - - # FIXME: whichways needs to reject large bboxes and the test needs to check for this - map = amf_result "/1" - assert map[0].empty? and map[1].empty? and map[2].empty? + check_bboxes_are_bad [bbox] do |map,bbox| + assert_boundary_error map, " The server said: The maximum bbox size is 0.25, and your request was too large. Either request a smaller area, or use planet.osm" + end end + ## + # checks that an invalid bounding box will not be served. in this case + # one with max < min latitudes. + # + # NOTE: the controller expands the bbox by 0.01 in each direction! def test_whichways_badlat - bboxes = [[0,0.1,0.1,0], [-0.1,80,0.1,70], [0.24,54.34,0.25,54.33]] - bboxes.each do |bbox| - amf_content "whichways", "/1", bbox - post :amf_read - assert_response :success - amf_parse_response - - # FIXME: whichways needs to reject bboxes with illegal lats and the test needs to check for this - map = amf_result "/1" - assert map[0].empty? and map[1].empty? and map[2].empty? + bboxes = [[0,0.1,0.1,0], [-0.1,80,0.1,70], [0.24,54.35,0.25,54.33]] + check_bboxes_are_bad bboxes do |map, bbox| + assert_boundary_error map, " The server said: The minimum latitude must be less than the maximum latitude, but it wasn't", bbox.inspect end end + ## + # same as test_whichways_badlat, but for longitudes + # + # NOTE: the controller expands the bbox by 0.01 in each direction! def test_whichways_badlon - bboxes = [[80,-0.1,70,0.1], [54.34,0.24,54.33,0.25]] - bboxes.each do |bbox| - amf_content "whichways", "/1", bbox - post :amf_read - assert_response :success - amf_parse_response - - # FIXME: whichways needs to reject bboxes with illegal lons and the test needs to check for this - map = amf_result "/1" - assert map[0].empty? and map[1].empty? and map[2].empty? + bboxes = [[80,-0.1,70,0.1], [54.35,0.24,54.33,0.25]] + check_bboxes_are_bad bboxes do |map, bbox| + assert_boundary_error map, " The server said: The minimum longitude must be less than the maximum longitude, but it wasn't", bbox.inspect end end @@ -107,9 +154,16 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase amf_parse_response # check contents of message - ways = amf_result "/1" - assert ways[0].include?(current_ways(:invisible_way).id) - assert !ways[0].include?(current_ways(:used_way).id) + map = amf_result "/1" + assert_equal 0, map[0], 'first map element should be 0' + assert_equal "", map[1], 'second map element should be an empty string' + assert_equal Array, map[2].class, 'third map element should be an array' + # TODO: looks like amf_controller changed since this test was written + # so someone who knows what they're doing should check this! + assert !map[2].include?(current_ways(:used_way).id), + "map should not include used way" + assert map[2].include?(current_ways(:invisible_way).id), + 'map should include deleted way' end def test_whichways_deleted_toobig @@ -119,8 +173,8 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase assert_response :success amf_parse_response - ways = amf_result "/1" - assert ways[0].empty? + map = amf_result "/1" + assert_deleted_boundary_error map, " The server said: The maximum bbox size is 0.25, and your request was too large. Either request a smaller area, or use planet.osm" end def test_getrelation @@ -129,7 +183,9 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase post :amf_read assert_response :success amf_parse_response - assert_equal amf_result("/1")[0], id + rel = amf_result("/1") + assert_equal rel[0], 0 + assert_equal rel[2], id end def test_getrelation_invisible @@ -139,8 +195,10 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase assert_response :success amf_parse_response rel = amf_result("/1") - assert_equal rel[0], id - assert rel[1].empty? and rel[2].empty? + assert_equal rel[0], -4 + assert_equal rel[1], "relation" + assert_equal rel[2], id + assert rel[3].nil? and rel[4].nil? end def test_getrelation_nonexistent @@ -150,45 +208,82 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase assert_response :success amf_parse_response rel = amf_result("/1") - assert_equal rel[0], id - assert rel[1].empty? and rel[2].empty? + assert_equal rel[0], -4 + assert_equal rel[1], "relation" + assert_equal rel[2], id + assert rel[3].nil? and rel[4].nil? end def test_getway_old # try to get the last visible version (specified by <0) (should be current version) latest = current_ways(:way_with_versions) + # NOTE: looks from the API changes that this now expects a timestamp + # instead of a version number... # try to get version 1 v1 = ways(:way_with_versions_v1) - {latest => -1, v1 => v1.version}.each do |way, v| - amf_content "getway_old", "/1", [way.id, v] + { latest.id => '', + v1.way_id => v1.timestamp.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S") + }.each do |id, t| + amf_content "getway_old", "/1", [id, t] + post :amf_read + assert_response :success + amf_parse_response + returned_way = amf_result("/1") + assert_equal 0, returned_way[0] + assert_equal id, returned_way[2] + # API returns the *latest* version, even for old ways... + assert_equal latest.version, returned_way[5] + end + end + + ## + # test that the server doesn't fall over when rubbish is passed + # into the method args. + def test_getway_old_invalid + way_id = current_ways(:way_with_versions).id + { "foo" => "bar", + way_id => "not a date", + way_id => "2009-03-25 00:00:00", # <- wrong format + way_id => "0 Jan 2009 00:00:00", # <- invalid date + -1 => "1 Jan 2009 00:00:00" # <- invalid ID + }.each do |id, t| + amf_content "getway_old", "/1", [id, t] post :amf_read assert_response :success amf_parse_response returned_way = amf_result("/1") - assert_equal returned_way[1], way.id - assert_equal returned_way[4], way.version + assert_equal -1, returned_way[0] + assert returned_way[3].nil? + assert returned_way[4].nil? + assert returned_way[5].nil? end end def test_getway_old_nonexistent # try to get the last version+10 (shoudn't exist) - latest = current_ways(:way_with_versions) + v1 = ways(:way_with_versions_v1) # try to get last visible version of non-existent way # try to get specific version of non-existent way - {nil => -1, nil => 1, latest => latest.version + 10}.each do |way, v| - amf_content "getway_old", "/1", [way.nil? ? 0 : way.id, v] + [[0, ''], + [0, '1 Jan 1970, 00:00:00'], + [v1.way_id, (v1.timestamp - 10).strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S")] + ].each do |id, t| + amf_content "getway_old", "/1", [id, t] post :amf_read assert_response :success amf_parse_response returned_way = amf_result("/1") - assert returned_way[2].empty? - assert returned_way[3].empty? - assert returned_way[4] < 0 + assert_equal -1, returned_way[0] + assert returned_way[3].nil? + assert returned_way[4].nil? + assert returned_way[5].nil? end end def test_getway_history latest = current_ways(:way_with_versions) + oldest = ways(:way_with_versions_v1) + amf_content "getway_history", "/1", [latest.id] post :amf_read assert_response :success @@ -196,10 +291,15 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase history = amf_result("/1") # ['way',wayid,history] - assert_equal history[0], 'way' - assert_equal history[1], latest.id - assert_equal history[2].first[0], latest.version - assert_equal history[2].last[0], ways(:way_with_versions_v1).version + assert_equal 'way', history[0] + assert_equal latest.id, history[1] + # We use dates rather than version numbers here, because you might + # have moved a node within a way (i.e. way version not incremented). + # The timestamp is +1 (timestamp.succ) because we say "give me the + # revision of 15:33:02", but that might actually include changes at + # 15:33:02.457. + assert_equal latest.timestamp.succ.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"), history[2].first[0] + assert_equal oldest.timestamp.succ.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"), history[2].last[0] end def test_getway_history_nonexistent @@ -224,10 +324,18 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase history = amf_result("/1") # ['node',nodeid,history] - assert_equal history[0], 'node' - assert_equal history[1], latest.id - assert_equal history[2].first[0], latest.timestamp.to_i - assert_equal history[2].last[0], nodes(:node_with_versions_v1).timestamp.to_i + # note that (as per getway_history) we actually round up + # to the next second + assert_equal history[0], 'node', + 'first element should be "node"' + assert_equal history[1], latest.id, + 'second element should be the input node ID' + assert_equal history[2].first[0], + latest.timestamp.succ.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"), + 'first element in third element (array) should be the latest version' + assert_equal history[2].last[0], + nodes(:node_with_versions_v1).timestamp.succ.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"), + 'last element in third element (array) should be the initial version' end def test_getnode_history_nonexistent @@ -243,6 +351,214 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase assert history[2].empty? end + # ************************************************************ + # AMF Write tests + def test_putpoi_update_valid + nd = current_nodes(:visible_node) + cs_id = changesets(:public_user_first_change).id + amf_content "putpoi", "/1", ["test@example.com:test", cs_id, nd.version, nd.id, nd.lon, nd.lat, nd.tags, nd.visible] + post :amf_write + assert_response :success + amf_parse_response + result = amf_result("/1") + + assert_equal 0, result[0] + assert_equal "", result[1] + assert_equal nd.id, result[2] + assert_equal nd.id, result[3] + assert_equal nd.version+1, result[4] + + # Now try to update again, with a different lat/lon, using the updated version number + lat = nd.lat+0.1 + lon = nd.lon-0.1 + amf_content "putpoi", "/2", ["test@example.com:test", cs_id, nd.version+1, nd.id, lon, lat, nd.tags, nd.visible] + post :amf_write + assert_response :success + amf_parse_response + result = amf_result("/2") + + assert_equal 0, result[0] + assert_equal "", result[1] + assert_equal nd.id, result[2] + assert_equal nd.id, result[3] + assert_equal nd.version+2, result[4] + end + + # Check that we can create a no valid poi + # Using similar method for the node controller test + def test_putpoi_create_valid + # This node has no tags + nd = Node.new + # create a node with random lat/lon + lat = rand(100)-50 + rand + lon = rand(100)-50 + rand + # normal user has a changeset open + changeset = changesets(:public_user_first_change) + + amf_content "putpoi", "/1", ["test@example.com:test", changeset.id, nil, nil, lon, lat, {}, nil] + post :amf_write + assert_response :success + amf_parse_response + result = amf_result("/1") + + # check the array returned by the amf + assert_equal 5, result.size + assert_equal 0, result[0], "expected to get the status ok from the amf" + assert_equal 0, result[2], "The old id should be 0" + assert result[3] > 0, "The new id should be greater than 0" + assert_equal 1, result[4], "The new version should be 1" + + # Finally check that the node that was saved has saved the data correctly + # in both the current and history tables + # First check the current table + current_node = Node.find(result[3].to_i) + assert_in_delta lat, current_node.lat, 0.00001, "The latitude was not retreieved correctly" + assert_in_delta lon, current_node.lon, 0.00001, "The longitude was not retreived correctly" + assert_equal 0, current_node.tags.size, "There seems to be a tag that has been added to the node" + assert_equal result[4], current_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf" + # Now check the history table + historic_nodes = Node.find(:all, :conditions => { :id => result[3] }) + assert_equal 1, historic_nodes.size, "There should only be one historic node created" + first_historic_node = historic_nodes.first + assert_in_delta lat, first_historic_node.lat, 0.00001, "The latitude was not retreived correctly" + assert_in_delta lon, first_historic_node.lon, 0.00001, "The longitude was not retreuved correctly" + assert_equal 0, first_historic_node.tags.size, "There seems to be a tag that have been attached to this node" + assert_equal result[4], first_historic_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf" + + #### + # This node has some tags + tnd = Node.new + # create a node with random lat/lon + lat = rand(100)-50 + rand + lon = rand(100)-50 + rand + # normal user has a changeset open + changeset = changesets(:public_user_first_change) + + amf_content "putpoi", "/2", ["test@example.com:test", changeset.id, nil, nil, lon, lat, { "key" => "value", "ping" => "pong" }, nil] + post :amf_write + assert_response :success + amf_parse_response + result = amf_result("/2") + + # check the array returned by the amf + assert_equal 5, result.size + assert_equal 0, result[0], "Expected to get the status ok in the amf" + assert_equal 0, result[2], "The old id should be 0" + assert result[3] > 0, "The new id should be greater than 0" + assert_equal 1, result[4], "The new version should be 1" + + # Finally check that the node that was saved has saved the data correctly + # in both the current and history tables + # First check the current table + current_node = Node.find(result[3].to_i) + assert_in_delta lat, current_node.lat, 0.00001, "The latitude was not retreieved correctly" + assert_in_delta lon, current_node.lon, 0.00001, "The longitude was not retreived correctly" + assert_equal 2, current_node.tags.size, "There seems to be a tag that has been added to the node" + assert_equal({ "key" => "value", "ping" => "pong" }, current_node.tags, "tags are different") + assert_equal result[4], current_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf" + # Now check the history table + historic_nodes = Node.find(:all, :conditions => { :id => result[3] }) + assert_equal 1, historic_nodes.size, "There should only be one historic node created" + first_historic_node = historic_nodes.first + assert_in_delta lat, first_historic_node.lat, 0.00001, "The latitude was not retreived correctly" + assert_in_delta lon, first_historic_node.lon, 0.00001, "The longitude was not retreuved correctly" + assert_equal 2, first_historic_node.tags.size, "There seems to be a tag that have been attached to this node" + assert_equal({ "key" => "value", "ping" => "pong" }, first_historic_node.tags, "tags are different") + assert_equal result[4], first_historic_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf" + end + + # try creating a POI with rubbish in the tags + def test_putpoi_create_with_control_chars + # This node has no tags + nd = Node.new + # create a node with random lat/lon + lat = rand(100)-50 + rand + lon = rand(100)-50 + rand + # normal user has a changeset open + changeset = changesets(:public_user_first_change) + + mostly_invalid = (0..31).to_a.map {|i| i.chr}.join + tags = { "something" => "foo#{mostly_invalid}bar" } + + amf_content "putpoi", "/1", ["test@example.com:test", changeset.id, nil, nil, lon, lat, tags, nil] + post :amf_write + assert_response :success + amf_parse_response + result = amf_result("/1") + + # check the array returned by the amf + assert_equal 5, result.size + assert_equal 0, result[0], "Expected to get the status ok in the amf" + assert_equal 0, result[2], "The old id should be 0" + assert result[3] > 0, "The new id should be greater than 0" + assert_equal 1, result[4], "The new version should be 1" + + # Finally check that the node that was saved has saved the data correctly + # in both the current and history tables + # First check the current table + current_node = Node.find(result[3].to_i) + assert_equal 1, current_node.tags.size, "There seems to be a tag that has been added to the node" + assert_equal({ "something" => "foo\t\n\rbar" }, current_node.tags, "tags were not fixed correctly") + assert_equal result[4], current_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf" + end + + # try creating a POI with rubbish in the tags + def test_putpoi_create_with_invalid_utf8 + # This node has no tags + nd = Node.new + # create a node with random lat/lon + lat = rand(100)-50 + rand + lon = rand(100)-50 + rand + # normal user has a changeset open + changeset = changesets(:public_user_first_change) + + invalid = "\xc0\xc0" + tags = { "something" => "foo#{invalid}bar" } + + amf_content "putpoi", "/1", ["test@example.com:test", changeset.id, nil, nil, lon, lat, tags, nil] + post :amf_write + assert_response :success + amf_parse_response + result = amf_result("/1") + + assert_equal 2, result.size + assert_equal -1, result[0], "Expected to get the status FAIL in the amf" + assert_equal "One of the tags is invalid. Linux users may need to upgrade to Flash Player 10.1.", result[1] + end + + def test_putpoi_delete_valid + + end + + def test_putpoi_delete_already_deleted + + end + + def test_putpoi_delete_not_found + + end + + def test_putpoi_invalid_latlon + + end + + def test_startchangeset_invalid_xmlchar_comment + invalid = "\035\022" + comment = "foo#{invalid}bar" + + amf_content "startchangeset", "/1", ["test@example.com:test", Hash.new, nil, comment, 1] + post :amf_write + assert_response :success + amf_parse_response + result = amf_result("/1") + + assert_equal 3, result.size, result.inspect + assert_equal 0, result[0] + new_cs_id = result[2].to_i + + cs = Changeset.find(new_cs_id) + assert_equal "foobar", cs.tags["comment"] + end # ************************************************************ # AMF Helper functions @@ -274,13 +590,8 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase # The result is a hash of message_ref => data. # The attribute @amf_result is initialised to this hash. def amf_parse_response - if @response.body.class.to_s == 'Proc' - res = StringIO.new() - @response.body.call @response, res - req = StringIO.new(res.string) - else - req = StringIO.new(@response.body) - end + req = StringIO.new(@response.body) + req.read(2) # version # parse through any headers @@ -305,4 +616,35 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase results end + ## + # given an array of bounding boxes (each an array of 4 floats), call the + # AMF "whichways" controller for each and pass the result back to the + # caller's block for assertion testing. + def check_bboxes_are_bad(bboxes) + bboxes.each do |bbox| + amf_content "whichways", "/1", bbox + post :amf_read + assert_response :success + amf_parse_response + + # pass the response back to the caller's block to be tested + # against what the caller expected. + map = amf_result "/1" + yield map, bbox + end + end + + # this should be what AMF controller returns when the bbox of a + # whichways request is invalid or too large. + def assert_boundary_error(map, msg=nil, error_hint=nil) + expected_map = [-2, "Sorry - I can't get the map for that area.#{msg}"] + assert_equal expected_map, map, "AMF controller should have returned an error. (#{error_hint})" + end + + # this should be what AMF controller returns when the bbox of a + # whichways_deleted request is invalid or too large. + def assert_deleted_boundary_error(map, msg=nil, error_hint=nil) + expected_map = [-2, "Sorry - I can't get the map for that area.#{msg}"] + assert_equal expected_map, map, "AMF controller should have returned an error. (#{error_hint})" + end end