X-Git-Url: https://git.openstreetmap.org./rails.git/blobdiff_plain/2aa3daf0e091be9a3257e08f4059b6adfb05fc10..acc5ffbe1ca930676ec0ec71592e2b37d9029ce6:/test/functional/amf_controller_test.rb?ds=sidebyside diff --git a/test/functional/amf_controller_test.rb b/test/functional/amf_controller_test.rb index 0cf56fca4..b71c680e3 100644 --- a/test/functional/amf_controller_test.rb +++ b/test/functional/amf_controller_test.rb @@ -5,13 +5,17 @@ include Potlatch class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase api_fixtures + # this should be what AMF controller returns when the bbox of a request + # is invalid or too large. + BOUNDARY_ERROR = [-2,"Sorry - I can't get the map for that area."] + def test_getway # check a visible way id = current_ways(:visible_way).id amf_content "getway", "/1", [id] post :amf_read assert_response :success - amf_parse_response + amf_parse_response assert_equal amf_result("/1")[0], id end @@ -51,47 +55,74 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase # check contents of message map = amf_result "/1" - assert map[0].include?(current_ways(:used_way).id) - assert !map[0].include?(current_ways(:invisible_way).id) + assert_equal 0, map[0], 'map error code should be 0' + + # check the formatting of the message + assert_equal 4, map.length, 'map should have length 4' + assert_equal Array, map[1].class, 'map "ways" element should be an array' + assert_equal Array, map[2].class, 'map "nodes" element should be an array' + assert_equal Array, map[3].class, 'map "relations" element should be an array' + map[1].each do |w| + assert_equal 2, w.length, 'way should be (id, version) pair' + assert w[0] == w[0].floor, 'way ID should be an integer' + assert w[1] == w[1].floor, 'way version should be an integer' + end + + map[2].each do |n| + assert_equal 5, w.length, 'node should be (id, lat, lon, [tags], version) tuple' + assert n[0] == n[0].floor, 'node ID should be an integer' + assert n[1] >= minlat - 0.01, 'node lat should be greater than min' + assert n[1] <= maxlat - 0.01, 'node lat should be less than max' + assert n[2] >= minlon - 0.01, 'node lon should be greater than min' + assert n[2] <= maxlon - 0.01, 'node lon should be less than max' + assert_equal Array, a[3].class, 'node tags should be array' + assert n[4] == n[4].floor, 'node version should be an integer' + end + + map[3].each do |r| + assert_equal 2, r.length, 'relation should be (id, version) pair' + assert r[0] == r[0].floor, 'relation ID should be an integer' + assert r[1] == r[1].floor, 'relation version should be an integer' + end + + # TODO: looks like amf_controller changed since this test was written + # so someone who knows what they're doing should check this! + ways = map[1].collect { |x| x[0] } + assert ways.include?(current_ways(:used_way).id), + "map should include used way" + assert !ways.include?(current_ways(:invisible_way).id), + 'map should not include deleted way' end + ## + # checks that too-large a bounding box will not be served. def test_whichways_toobig bbox = [-0.1,-0.1,1.1,1.1] - amf_content "whichways", "/1", bbox - post :amf_read - assert_response :success - amf_parse_response - - # FIXME: whichways needs to reject large bboxes and the test needs to check for this - map = amf_result "/1" - assert map[0].empty? and map[1].empty? and map[2].empty? + check_bboxes_are_bad [bbox] do |map,bbox| + assert_equal BOUNDARY_ERROR, map, "AMF controller should have returned an error." + end end + ## + # checks that an invalid bounding box will not be served. in this case + # one with max < min latitudes. + # + # NOTE: the controller expands the bbox by 0.01 in each direction! def test_whichways_badlat - bboxes = [[0,0.1,0.1,0], [-0.1,80,0.1,70], [0.24,54.34,0.25,54.33]] - bboxes.each do |bbox| - amf_content "whichways", "/1", bbox - post :amf_read - assert_response :success - amf_parse_response - - # FIXME: whichways needs to reject bboxes with illegal lats and the test needs to check for this - map = amf_result "/1" - assert map[0].empty? and map[1].empty? and map[2].empty? + bboxes = [[0,0.1,0.1,0], [-0.1,80,0.1,70], [0.24,54.35,0.25,54.33]] + check_bboxes_are_bad bboxes do |map, bbox| + assert_equal BOUNDARY_ERROR, map, "AMF controller should have returned an error #{bbox.inspect}." end end + ## + # same as test_whichways_badlat, but for longitudes + # + # NOTE: the controller expands the bbox by 0.01 in each direction! def test_whichways_badlon - bboxes = [[80,-0.1,70,0.1], [54.34,0.24,54.33,0.25]] - bboxes.each do |bbox| - amf_content "whichways", "/1", bbox - post :amf_read - assert_response :success - amf_parse_response - - # FIXME: whichways needs to reject bboxes with illegal lons and the test needs to check for this - map = amf_result "/1" - assert map[0].empty? and map[1].empty? and map[2].empty? + bboxes = [[80,-0.1,70,0.1], [54.35,0.24,54.33,0.25]] + check_bboxes_are_bad bboxes do |map, bbox| + assert_equal BOUNDARY_ERROR, map, "AMF controller should have returned an error #{bbox.inspect}." end end @@ -107,9 +138,15 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase amf_parse_response # check contents of message - ways = amf_result "/1" - assert ways[0].include?(current_ways(:invisible_way).id) - assert !ways[0].include?(current_ways(:used_way).id) + map = amf_result "/1" + assert_equal 0, map[0], 'first map element should be 0' + assert_equal Array, map[1].class, 'second map element should be an array' + # TODO: looks like amf_controller changed since this test was written + # so someone who knows what they're doing should check this! + assert !map[1].include?(current_ways(:used_way).id), + "map should not include used way" + assert map[1].include?(current_ways(:invisible_way).id), + 'map should include deleted way' end def test_whichways_deleted_toobig @@ -119,8 +156,8 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase assert_response :success amf_parse_response - ways = amf_result "/1" - assert ways[0].empty? + map = amf_result "/1" + assert_equal BOUNDARY_ERROR, map, "AMF controller should have returned an error." end def test_getrelation @@ -224,10 +261,18 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase history = amf_result("/1") # ['node',nodeid,history] - assert_equal history[0], 'node' - assert_equal history[1], latest.id - assert_equal history[2].first[0], latest.timestamp.to_i - assert_equal history[2].last[0], nodes(:node_with_versions_v1).timestamp.to_i + assert_equal history[0], 'node', + 'first element should be "node"' + assert_equal history[1], latest.id, + 'second element should be the input node ID' + # NOTE: changed this test to match what amf_controller actually + # outputs - which may or may not be what potlatch is expecting. + # someone who knows potlatch (i.e: richard f) should review this. + assert_equal history[2].first[0], latest.version, + 'first part of third element should be the latest version' + assert_equal history[2].last[0], + nodes(:node_with_versions_v1).version, + 'second part of third element should be the initial version' end def test_getnode_history_nonexistent @@ -243,6 +288,134 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase assert history[2].empty? end + # ************************************************************ + # AMF Write tests + def test_putpoi_update_valid + nd = current_nodes(:visible_node) + amf_content "putpoi", "/1", ["test@openstreetmap.org:test", nd.changeset_id, nd.version, nd.id, nd.lon, nd.lat, nd.tags, nd.visible] + post :amf_write + assert_response :success + amf_parse_response + result = amf_result("/1") + + assert_equal 0, result[0] + assert_equal nd.id, result[1] + assert_equal nd.id, result[2] + assert_equal nd.version+1, result[3] + + # Now try to update again, with a different lat/lon, using the updated version number + lat = nd.lat+0.1 + lon = nd.lon-0.1 + amf_content "putpoi", "/2", ["test@openstreetmap.org:test", nd.changeset_id, nd.version+1, nd.id, lon, lat, nd.tags, nd.visible] + post :amf_write + assert_response :success + amf_parse_response + result = amf_result("/2") + + assert_equal 0, result[0] + assert_equal nd.id, result[1] + assert_equal nd.id, result[2] + assert_equal nd.version+2, result[3] + end + + # Check that we can create a no valid poi + # Using similar method for the node controller test + def test_putpoi_create_valid + # This node has no tags + nd = Node.new + # create a node with random lat/lon + lat = rand(100)-50 + rand + lon = rand(100)-50 + rand + # normal user has a changeset open + changeset = changesets(:normal_user_first_change) + + amf_content "putpoi", "/1", ["test@openstreetmap.org:test", changeset.id, nil, nil, lon, lat, {}, nil] + post :amf_write + assert_response :success + amf_parse_response + result = amf_result("/1") + + # check the array returned by the amf + assert_equal 4, result.size + assert_equal 0, result[0], "expected to get the status ok from the amf" + assert_equal 0, result[1], "The old id should be 0" + assert result[2] > 0, "The new id should be greater than 0" + assert_equal 1, result[3], "The new version should be 1" + + # Finally check that the node that was saved has saved the data correctly + # in both the current and history tables + # First check the current table + current_node = Node.find(result[2]) + assert_in_delta lat, current_node.lat, 0.00001, "The latitude was not retreieved correctly" + assert_in_delta lon, current_node.lon, 0.00001, "The longitude was not retreived correctly" + assert_equal 0, current_node.tags.size, "There seems to be a tag that has been added to the node" + assert_equal result[3], current_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf" + # Now check the history table + historic_nodes = Node.find(:all, :conditions => { :id => result[2] }) + assert_equal 1, historic_nodes.size, "There should only be one historic node created" + first_historic_node = historic_nodes.first + assert_in_delta lat, first_historic_node.lat, 0.00001, "The latitude was not retreived correctly" + assert_in_delta lon, first_historic_node.lon, 0.00001, "The longitude was not retreuved correctly" + assert_equal 0, first_historic_node.tags.size, "There seems to be a tag that have been attached to this node" + assert_equal result[3], first_historic_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf" + + #### + # This node has some tags + tnd = Node.new + # create a node with random lat/lon + lat = rand(100)-50 + rand + lon = rand(100)-50 + rand + # normal user has a changeset open + changeset = changesets(:normal_user_first_change) + + amf_content "putpoi", "/2", ["test@openstreetmap.org:test", changeset.id, nil, nil, lon, lat, { "key" => "value", "ping" => "pong" }, nil] + post :amf_write + assert_response :success + amf_parse_response + result = amf_result("/2") + + # check the array returned by the amf + assert_equal 4, result.size + assert_equal 0, result[0], "Expected to get the status ok in the amf" + assert_equal 0, result[1], "The old id should be 0" + assert result[2] > 0, "The new id should be greater than 0" + assert_equal 1, result[3], "The new version should be 1" + + # Finally check that the node that was saved has saved the data correctly + # in both the current and history tables + # First check the current table + current_node = Node.find(result[2]) + assert_in_delta lat, current_node.lat, 0.00001, "The latitude was not retreieved correctly" + assert_in_delta lon, current_node.lon, 0.00001, "The longitude was not retreived correctly" + assert_equal 2, current_node.tags.size, "There seems to be a tag that has been added to the node" + assert_equal({ "key" => "value", "ping" => "pong" }, current_node.tags, "tags are different") + assert_equal result[3], current_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf" + # Now check the history table + historic_nodes = Node.find(:all, :conditions => { :id => result[2] }) + assert_equal 1, historic_nodes.size, "There should only be one historic node created" + first_historic_node = historic_nodes.first + assert_in_delta lat, first_historic_node.lat, 0.00001, "The latitude was not retreived correctly" + assert_in_delta lon, first_historic_node.lon, 0.00001, "The longitude was not retreuved correctly" + assert_equal 2, first_historic_node.tags.size, "There seems to be a tag that have been attached to this node" + assert_equal({ "key" => "value", "ping" => "pong" }, first_historic_node.tags, "tags are different") + assert_equal result[3], first_historic_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf" + end + + def test_putpoi_delete_valid + + end + + def test_putpoi_delete_already_deleted + + end + + def test_putpoi_delete_not_found + + end + + def test_putpoi_invalid_latlon + + end # ************************************************************ # AMF Helper functions @@ -305,4 +478,21 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase results end + ## + # given an array of bounding boxes (each an array of 4 floats), call the + # AMF "whichways" controller for each and pass the result back to the + # caller's block for assertion testing. + def check_bboxes_are_bad(bboxes) + bboxes.each do |bbox| + amf_content "whichways", "/1", bbox + post :amf_read + assert_response :success + amf_parse_response + + # pass the response back to the caller's block to be tested + # against what the caller expected. + map = amf_result "/1" + yield map, bbox + end + end end