X-Git-Url: https://git.openstreetmap.org./rails.git/blobdiff_plain/3ed9ac21b506100d253d62ba70e84b3060263014..aa626e218d04959adae99fc2a3732239c6864fc6:/test/functional/amf_controller_test.rb?ds=sidebyside

diff --git a/test/functional/amf_controller_test.rb b/test/functional/amf_controller_test.rb
index eb7fd1487..0e9cda06f 100644
--- a/test/functional/amf_controller_test.rb
+++ b/test/functional/amf_controller_test.rb
@@ -5,10 +5,6 @@ include Potlatch
 class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
   api_fixtures
 
-  # this should be what AMF controller returns when the bbox of a request
-  # is invalid or too large.
-  BOUNDARY_ERROR = [-2,"Sorry - I can't get the map for that area."]
-
   def test_getway
     # check a visible way
     id = current_ways(:visible_way).id
@@ -16,7 +12,9 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
     post :amf_read
     assert_response :success
     amf_parse_response                                         
-    assert_equal amf_result("/1")[0], id
+    way = amf_result("/1")
+    assert_equal way[0], 0
+    assert_equal way[2], id
   end
 
   def test_getway_invisible
@@ -27,8 +25,10 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
     assert_response :success
     amf_parse_response
     way = amf_result("/1")
-    assert_equal way[0], id
-    assert way[1].empty? and way[2].empty?
+    assert_equal way[0], -4
+    assert_equal way[1], "way"
+    assert_equal way[2], id
+    assert way[3].empty? and way[4].empty?
   end
 
   def test_getway_nonexistent
@@ -38,8 +38,10 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
     assert_response :success
     amf_parse_response
     way = amf_result("/1")
-    assert_equal way[0], 0
-    assert way[1].empty? and way[2].empty?
+    assert_equal way[0], -4
+    assert_equal way[1], "way"
+    assert_equal way[2], 0
+    assert way[3].empty? and way[4].empty?
   end
 
   def test_whichways
@@ -55,11 +57,40 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
 
     # check contents of message
     map = amf_result "/1"
-    assert_equal 0, map[0], 'first map element should be 0'
-    assert_equal Array, map[1].class, 'second map element should be an array'
+    assert_equal 0, map[0], 'map error code should be 0'
+    assert_equal "", map[1], 'map error text should be empty'
+
+    # check the formatting of the message
+    assert_equal 5, map.length, 'map should have length 5'
+    assert_equal Array, map[2].class, 'map "ways" element should be an array'
+    assert_equal Array, map[3].class, 'map "nodes" element should be an array'
+    assert_equal Array, map[4].class, 'map "relations" element should be an array'
+    map[2].each do |w|
+      assert_equal 2, w.length, 'way should be (id, version) pair'
+      assert w[0] == w[0].floor, 'way ID should be an integer'
+      assert w[1] == w[1].floor, 'way version should be an integer'
+    end
+
+    map[3].each do |n|
+      assert_equal 5, w.length, 'node should be (id, lat, lon, [tags], version) tuple'
+      assert n[0] == n[0].floor, 'node ID should be an integer'
+      assert n[1] >= minlat - 0.01, 'node lat should be greater than min'
+      assert n[1] <= maxlat - 0.01, 'node lat should be less than max'
+      assert n[2] >= minlon - 0.01, 'node lon should be greater than min'
+      assert n[2] <= maxlon - 0.01, 'node lon should be less than max'
+      assert_equal Array, a[3].class, 'node tags should be array'
+      assert n[4] == n[4].floor, 'node version should be an integer'
+    end
+
+    map[4].each do |r|
+      assert_equal 2, r.length, 'relation should be (id, version) pair'
+      assert r[0] == r[0].floor, 'relation ID should be an integer'
+      assert r[1] == r[1].floor, 'relation version should be an integer'
+    end
+
     # TODO: looks like amf_controller changed since this test was written
     # so someone who knows what they're doing should check this!
-    ways = map[1].collect { |x| x[0] }
+    ways = map[2].collect { |x| x[0] }
     assert ways.include?(current_ways(:used_way).id),
       "map should include used way"
     assert !ways.include?(current_ways(:invisible_way).id),
@@ -71,7 +102,7 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
   def test_whichways_toobig
     bbox = [-0.1,-0.1,1.1,1.1]
     check_bboxes_are_bad [bbox] do |map,bbox|
-      assert_equal BOUNDARY_ERROR, map, "AMF controller should have returned an error."
+      assert_boundary_error map, " The server said: The maximum bbox size is 0.25, and your request was too large. Either request a smaller area, or use planet.osm"
     end
   end
 
@@ -83,7 +114,7 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
   def test_whichways_badlat
     bboxes = [[0,0.1,0.1,0], [-0.1,80,0.1,70], [0.24,54.35,0.25,54.33]]
     check_bboxes_are_bad bboxes do |map, bbox|
-      assert_equal BOUNDARY_ERROR, map, "AMF controller should have returned an error #{bbox.inspect}."
+      assert_boundary_error map, " The server said: The minimum latitude must be less than the maximum latitude, but it wasn't", bbox.inspect
     end
   end
 
@@ -94,7 +125,7 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
   def test_whichways_badlon
     bboxes = [[80,-0.1,70,0.1], [54.35,0.24,54.33,0.25]]
     check_bboxes_are_bad bboxes do |map, bbox|
-      assert_equal BOUNDARY_ERROR, map, "AMF controller should have returned an error #{bbox.inspect}."
+      assert_boundary_error map, " The server said: The minimum longitude must be less than the maximum longitude, but it wasn't", bbox.inspect
     end
   end
 
@@ -112,12 +143,13 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
     # check contents of message
     map = amf_result "/1"
     assert_equal 0, map[0], 'first map element should be 0'
-    assert_equal Array, map[1].class, 'second map element should be an array'
+    assert_equal "", map[1], 'second map element should be an empty string'
+    assert_equal Array, map[2].class, 'third map element should be an array'
     # TODO: looks like amf_controller changed since this test was written
     # so someone who knows what they're doing should check this!
-    assert !map[1].include?(current_ways(:used_way).id),
+    assert !map[2].include?(current_ways(:used_way).id),
       "map should not include used way"
-    assert map[1].include?(current_ways(:invisible_way).id),
+    assert map[2].include?(current_ways(:invisible_way).id),
       'map should include deleted way'
   end
 
@@ -129,7 +161,7 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
     amf_parse_response 
 
     map = amf_result "/1"
-    assert_equal BOUNDARY_ERROR, map, "AMF controller should have returned an error."
+    assert_deleted_boundary_error map, " The server said: The maximum bbox size is 0.25, and your request was too large. Either request a smaller area, or use planet.osm"
   end
 
   def test_getrelation
@@ -138,7 +170,9 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
     post :amf_read
     assert_response :success
     amf_parse_response
-    assert_equal amf_result("/1")[0], id
+    rel = amf_result("/1")
+    assert_equal rel[0], 0
+    assert_equal rel[2], id
   end
 
   def test_getrelation_invisible
@@ -148,8 +182,10 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
     assert_response :success
     amf_parse_response
     rel = amf_result("/1")
-    assert_equal rel[0], id
-    assert rel[1].empty? and rel[2].empty?
+    assert_equal rel[0], -4
+    assert_equal rel[1], "relation"
+    assert_equal rel[2], id
+    assert rel[3].empty? and rel[4].empty?
   end
 
   def test_getrelation_nonexistent
@@ -159,45 +195,82 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
     assert_response :success
     amf_parse_response
     rel = amf_result("/1")
-    assert_equal rel[0], id
-    assert rel[1].empty? and rel[2].empty?
+    assert_equal rel[0], -4
+    assert_equal rel[1], "relation"
+    assert_equal rel[2], id
+    assert rel[3].empty? and rel[4].empty?
   end
 
   def test_getway_old
     # try to get the last visible version (specified by <0) (should be current version)
     latest = current_ways(:way_with_versions)
+    # NOTE: looks from the API changes that this now expects a timestamp
+    # instead of a version number...
     # try to get version 1
     v1 = ways(:way_with_versions_v1)
-    {latest => -1, v1 => v1.version}.each do |way, v|
-      amf_content "getway_old", "/1", [way.id, v]
+    { latest => '', 
+      v1 => v1.timestamp.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S")
+    }.each do |way, t|
+      amf_content "getway_old", "/1", [way.id, t]
+      post :amf_read      
+      assert_response :success
+      amf_parse_response
+      returned_way = amf_result("/1")
+      assert_equal 0, returned_way[0]
+      assert_equal way.id, returned_way[2]
+      # API returns the *latest* version, even for old ways...
+      assert_equal latest.version, returned_way[5]
+    end
+  end
+  
+  ##
+  # test that the server doesn't fall over when rubbish is passed
+  # into the method args.
+  def test_getway_old_invalid
+    way_id = current_ways(:way_with_versions).id
+    { "foo"  => "bar",
+      way_id => "not a date",
+      way_id => "2009-03-25 00:00:00", # <- wrong format
+      way_id => "0 Jan 2009 00:00:00", # <- invalid date
+      -1     => "1 Jan 2009 00:00:00"  # <- invalid ID
+    }.each do |id, t|
+      amf_content "getway_old", "/1", [id, t]
       post :amf_read
       assert_response :success
       amf_parse_response
       returned_way = amf_result("/1")
-      assert_equal returned_way[1], way.id
-      assert_equal returned_way[4], way.version
+      assert_equal -1, returned_way[0]
+      assert returned_way[3].empty?
+      assert returned_way[4].empty?
+      assert returned_way[5].nil?
     end
   end
 
   def test_getway_old_nonexistent
     # try to get the last version+10 (shoudn't exist)
-    latest = current_ways(:way_with_versions)
+    v1 = ways(:way_with_versions_v1)
     # try to get last visible version of non-existent way
     # try to get specific version of non-existent way
-    {nil => -1, nil => 1, latest => latest.version + 10}.each do |way, v|
-      amf_content "getway_old", "/1", [way.nil? ? 0 : way.id, v]
+    [[nil, ''], 
+     [nil, '1 Jan 1970, 00:00:00'], 
+     [v1, (v1.timestamp - 10).strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S")]
+    ].each do |way, t|
+      amf_content "getway_old", "/1", [way.nil? ? 0 : way.id, t]
       post :amf_read
       assert_response :success
       amf_parse_response
       returned_way = amf_result("/1")
-      assert returned_way[2].empty?
+      assert_equal -1, returned_way[0]
       assert returned_way[3].empty?
-      assert returned_way[4] < 0
+      assert returned_way[4].empty?
+      assert returned_way[5].nil?
     end
   end
 
   def test_getway_history
     latest = current_ways(:way_with_versions)
+    oldest = ways(:way_with_versions_v1)
+
     amf_content "getway_history", "/1", [latest.id]
     post :amf_read
     assert_response :success
@@ -205,10 +278,12 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
     history = amf_result("/1")
 
     # ['way',wayid,history]
-    assert_equal history[0], 'way'
-    assert_equal history[1], latest.id
-    assert_equal history[2].first[0], latest.version
-    assert_equal history[2].last[0], ways(:way_with_versions_v1).version
+    assert_equal 'way', history[0]
+    assert_equal latest.id, history[1] 
+    # for some reason undocumented, the potlatch API now prefers dates
+    # over version numbers. presumably no-one edits concurrently any more?
+    assert_equal latest.timestamp.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"), history[2].first[0]
+    assert_equal oldest.timestamp.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"), history[2].last[0]
   end
 
   def test_getway_history_nonexistent
@@ -240,10 +315,13 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
     # NOTE: changed this test to match what amf_controller actually 
     # outputs - which may or may not be what potlatch is expecting.
     # someone who knows potlatch (i.e: richard f) should review this.
-    assert_equal history[2].first[0], latest.version,
+    # NOTE2: wow - this is the second time this has changed in the
+    # API and the tests are being patched up. 
+    assert_equal history[2].first[0], 
+      latest.timestamp.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"),
       'first part of third element should be the latest version'
     assert_equal history[2].last[0], 
-      nodes(:node_with_versions_v1).version,
+      nodes(:node_with_versions_v1).timestamp.strftime("%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S"),
       'second part of third element should be the initial version'
   end
 
@@ -264,30 +342,33 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
   # AMF Write tests
   def test_putpoi_update_valid
     nd = current_nodes(:visible_node)
-    amf_content "putpoi", "/1", ["test@openstreetmap.org:test", nd.changeset_id, nd.version, nd.id, nd.lon, nd.lat, nd.tags, nd.visible]
+    cs_id = changesets(:public_user_first_change).id
+    amf_content "putpoi", "/1", ["test@example.com:test", cs_id, nd.version, nd.id, nd.lon, nd.lat, nd.tags, nd.visible]
     post :amf_write
     assert_response :success
     amf_parse_response
     result = amf_result("/1")
     
     assert_equal 0, result[0]
-    assert_equal nd.id, result[1]
+    assert_equal "", result[1]
     assert_equal nd.id, result[2]
-    assert_equal nd.version+1, result[3]
+    assert_equal nd.id, result[3]
+    assert_equal nd.version+1, result[4]
     
     # Now try to update again, with a different lat/lon, using the updated version number
     lat = nd.lat+0.1
     lon = nd.lon-0.1
-    amf_content "putpoi", "/2", ["test@openstreetmap.org:test", nd.changeset_id, nd.version+1, nd.id, lon, lat, nd.tags, nd.visible]
+    amf_content "putpoi", "/2", ["test@example.com:test", cs_id, nd.version+1, nd.id, lon, lat, nd.tags, nd.visible]
     post :amf_write
     assert_response :success
     amf_parse_response
     result = amf_result("/2")
     
     assert_equal 0, result[0]
-    assert_equal nd.id, result[1]
+    assert_equal "", result[1]
     assert_equal nd.id, result[2]
-    assert_equal nd.version+2, result[3]
+    assert_equal nd.id, result[3]
+    assert_equal nd.version+2, result[4]
   end
   
   # Check that we can create a no valid poi
@@ -299,37 +380,37 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
     lat = rand(100)-50 + rand
     lon = rand(100)-50 + rand
     # normal user has a changeset open
-    changeset = changesets(:normal_user_first_change)
+    changeset = changesets(:public_user_first_change)
     
-    amf_content "putpoi", "/1", ["test@openstreetmap.org:test", changeset.id, nil, nil, lon, lat, {}, nil]
+    amf_content "putpoi", "/1", ["test@example.com:test", changeset.id, nil, nil, lon, lat, {}, nil]
     post :amf_write
     assert_response :success
     amf_parse_response
     result = amf_result("/1")
     
     # check the array returned by the amf
-    assert_equal 4, result.size
+    assert_equal 5, result.size
     assert_equal 0, result[0], "expected to get the status ok from the amf"
-    assert_equal 0, result[1], "The old id should be 0"
-    assert result[2] > 0, "The new id should be greater than 0"
-    assert_equal 1, result[3], "The new version should be 1"
+    assert_equal 0, result[2], "The old id should be 0"
+    assert result[3] > 0, "The new id should be greater than 0"
+    assert_equal 1, result[4], "The new version should be 1"
     
     # Finally check that the node that was saved has saved the data correctly 
     # in both the current and history tables
     # First check the current table
-    current_node = Node.find(result[2])
+    current_node = Node.find(result[3])
     assert_in_delta lat, current_node.lat, 0.00001, "The latitude was not retreieved correctly"
     assert_in_delta lon, current_node.lon, 0.00001, "The longitude was not retreived correctly"
     assert_equal 0, current_node.tags.size, "There seems to be a tag that has been added to the node"
-    assert_equal result[3], current_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf"
+    assert_equal result[4], current_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf"
     # Now check the history table
-    historic_nodes = Node.find(:all, :conditions => { :id => result[2] })
+    historic_nodes = Node.find(:all, :conditions => { :id => result[3] })
     assert_equal 1, historic_nodes.size, "There should only be one historic node created"
     first_historic_node = historic_nodes.first
     assert_in_delta lat, first_historic_node.lat, 0.00001, "The latitude was not retreived correctly"
     assert_in_delta lon, first_historic_node.lon, 0.00001, "The longitude was not retreuved correctly"
     assert_equal 0, first_historic_node.tags.size, "There seems to be a tag that have been attached to this node"
-    assert_equal result[3], first_historic_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf"
+    assert_equal result[4], first_historic_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf"
     
     ####
     # This node has some tags
@@ -338,40 +419,55 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
     lat = rand(100)-50 + rand
     lon = rand(100)-50 + rand
     # normal user has a changeset open
-    changeset = changesets(:normal_user_first_change)
+    changeset = changesets(:public_user_first_change)
     
-    amf_content "putpoi", "/2", ["test@openstreetmap.org:test", changeset.id, nil, nil, lon, lat, { "key" => "value", "ping" => "pong" }, nil]
+    amf_content "putpoi", "/2", ["test@example.com:test", changeset.id, nil, nil, lon, lat, { "key" => "value", "ping" => "pong" }, nil]
     post :amf_write
     assert_response :success
     amf_parse_response
     result = amf_result("/2")
 
     # check the array returned by the amf
-    assert_equal 4, result.size
+    assert_equal 5, result.size
     assert_equal 0, result[0], "Expected to get the status ok in the amf"
-    assert_equal 0, result[1], "The old id should be 0"
-    assert result[2] > 0, "The new id should be greater than 0"
-    assert_equal 1, result[3], "The new version should be 1"
+    assert_equal 0, result[2], "The old id should be 0"
+    assert result[3] > 0, "The new id should be greater than 0"
+    assert_equal 1, result[4], "The new version should be 1"
     
     # Finally check that the node that was saved has saved the data correctly 
     # in both the current and history tables
     # First check the current table
-    current_node = Node.find(result[2])
+    current_node = Node.find(result[3])
     assert_in_delta lat, current_node.lat, 0.00001, "The latitude was not retreieved correctly"
     assert_in_delta lon, current_node.lon, 0.00001, "The longitude was not retreived correctly"
     assert_equal 2, current_node.tags.size, "There seems to be a tag that has been added to the node"
     assert_equal({ "key" => "value", "ping" => "pong" }, current_node.tags, "tags are different")
-    assert_equal result[3], current_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf"
+    assert_equal result[4], current_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf"
     # Now check the history table
-    historic_nodes = Node.find(:all, :conditions => { :id => result[2] })
+    historic_nodes = Node.find(:all, :conditions => { :id => result[3] })
     assert_equal 1, historic_nodes.size, "There should only be one historic node created"
     first_historic_node = historic_nodes.first
     assert_in_delta lat, first_historic_node.lat, 0.00001, "The latitude was not retreived correctly"
     assert_in_delta lon, first_historic_node.lon, 0.00001, "The longitude was not retreuved correctly"
     assert_equal 2, first_historic_node.tags.size, "There seems to be a tag that have been attached to this node"
     assert_equal({ "key" => "value", "ping" => "pong" }, first_historic_node.tags, "tags are different")
-    assert_equal result[3], first_historic_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf"
-
+    assert_equal result[4], first_historic_node.version, "The version returned, is different to the one returned by the amf"
+  end
+  
+  def test_putpoi_delete_valid
+    
+  end
+  
+  def test_putpoi_delete_already_deleted
+    
+  end
+  
+  def test_putpoi_delete_not_found
+    
+  end
+  
+  def test_putpoi_invalid_latlon
+    
   end
 
   # ************************************************************
@@ -452,4 +548,18 @@ class AmfControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
       yield map, bbox
     end
   end
+  
+  # this should be what AMF controller returns when the bbox of a
+  # whichways request is invalid or too large.
+  def assert_boundary_error(map, msg=nil, error_hint=nil)
+    expected_map = [-2, "Sorry - I can't get the map for that area.#{msg}", [], [], []]
+    assert_equal expected_map, map, "AMF controller should have returned an error. (#{error_hint})"
+  end
+
+  # this should be what AMF controller returns when the bbox of a
+  # whichways_deleted request is invalid or too large.
+  def assert_deleted_boundary_error(map, msg=nil, error_hint=nil)
+    expected_map = [-2, "Sorry - I can't get the map for that area.#{msg}", []]
+    assert_equal expected_map, map, "AMF controller should have returned an error. (#{error_hint})"
+  end
 end